OpenAI valued at $80B after deal / Reddit inks AI training deal / Xpeng to invest $486M in AI R&D [EN]

OpenAI's valuation has soared to over $80 billion following a deal with Thrive Capital, Air Canada is mandated to refund a passenger due to misinformation from its chatbot, and Reddit secures a $60M annual deal to license its content for AI training.

Host 1:Did you happen to hear about OpenAI's recent move? Their employees are now able to sell shares at a valuation of over $80 billion. Quite the lucrative deal, isn't it?
Host 2:That's an absolutely staggering figure! It's as if they're playing Monopoly with real money. However, let's dissect this for our listeners. OpenAI is a prominent player in the AI field, and this deal truly underscores the immense value and potential of AI technology.
Host 1:Absolutely! On the topic of AI, there's a rather intriguing development. Air Canada has been instructed to reimburse a passenger due to an erroneous claim made by their chatbot.
Host 2:Oh, the irony! An AI making an error and a human footing the bill. It serves as a poignant reminder that despite the remarkable progress of AI, it remains fallible.
Host 1:Indeed. On a rather intriguing note, Reddit has recently entered into an agreement to license content for the purpose of AI training. Quite an interesting move, wouldn't you say?
Host 2:Fascinating. Reddit truly is a veritable treasure trove of diverse content. From instructing AI in the art of creating memes to navigating the intricate labyrinth of Reddit threads, it offers a rich tapestry of material for AI training.
Host 1:Or delving into the intricacies of human emotions and responses. It truly is an enthralling era in the realm of AI, wouldn't you agree?
Host 2:Absolutely. We shall endeavor to keep our esteemed listeners abreast of the latest developments. Do stay tuned, ladies and gentlemen!
Host 1:Our esteemed tech aficionado, have you caught wind of OpenAI's recent collaboration with Thrive Capital?
Host 2:My dear, I'm always in the know! OpenAI's valuation has skyrocketed to an astounding $80 billion or more. It's akin to transitioning from a bicycle to a rocket in a mere 10 months!
Host 1:"Indeed! OpenAI's valuation now places it as the world's third most valuable tech startup, trailing behind the likes of TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, and SpaceX. Quite the impressive company to keep, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:Absolutely! They're now mingling in the upper echelons, alongside ByteDance, valued at a staggering $225 billion, and SpaceX, at a princely $150 billion. These numbers are straight from CB Insights, mind you.
Host 1:That's quite the illustrious company to be associated with! Could you kindly elucidate this transaction for our esteemed audience? How exactly does it operate?
Host 2:"Absolutely! OpenAI will be conducting a tender offer, led by Thrive Capital, to sell existing shares. It's a rather unconventional fundraising round, providing an opportunity for OpenAI employees to cash in on their shares and pocket some tidy profits."
Host 1:"So, it's not just a matter of raising funds, but also providing employees with an opportunity to cash in. And I've heard whispers of the tender offer valuing OpenAI at a staggering $86 billion. Quite the eye-watering figure, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:"Quite right! That's the precise figure as reported by Bloomberg. This transaction transpires nearly a year subsequent to OpenAI's closure of a $300 million share sale, which bestowed a valuation of approximately $27 to $29 billion upon the company. During that tender offer, Thrive, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and K2 Global concurred to procure OpenAI shares."
Host 1:"Quite the remarkable leap, isn't it? Going from $29 billion to $86 billion in just a year. It's akin to witnessing the growth of a tech unicorn right in front of our very eyes!"
Host 2:"Indeed! It's akin to witnessing a tech fairytale unfold before our very eyes. Such a captivating world we inhabit, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 1:"Have you heard about the recent legal tussle in Canada involving Air Canada's chatbot? Given your expertise in all things tech, I'm sure you're well-versed in the details."
Host 2:Ah, the one where the chatbot took on a Pinocchio persona and started spinning tales about the airline's bereavement travel policy? Indeed, I've been keeping a close eye on that intriguing case. Quite a fascinating turn of events, wouldn't you say?
Host 1:Indeed, that's the incident. Jake Moffatt, the customer, was given false information by the chatbot regarding a bereavement discount following his grandmother's passing. Subsequently, he discovered that Air Canada's policy does not permit refunds after the flight has taken place. Consequently, he initiated legal action against the airline to recover the fare difference.
Host 2:"Absolutely fascinating! Air Canada attempted to argue that its chatbot is merely an AI 'experiment' and a distinct legal entity. They even went so far as to claim that the bot was 'accountable for its own actions.' Quite the audacious stance, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 1:"It's quite the audacious move, I must say. However, it seems that their bold stance didn't quite carry the day with the tribunal, did it?"
Host 2:"Quite the intriguing development, I must say. Just last week, Tribune member Christopher Rivers ruled in favor of Moffat. He found that Air Canada had engaged in 'negligent misrepresentation' and is obligated to honor the chatbot's promised discount. Furthermore, he remarked that the airline 'failed to take reasonable care to ensure the accuracy of its chatbot.' Quite a scathing indictment, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 1:"So, it's a triumph for the underdog, isn't it? And it could potentially revolutionize the landscape of legal accountability for AI-driven customer service, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:"Quite right. It's a pivotal case that could establish a significant precedent. It serves as a stark reminder that companies must ensure the reliability and accuracy of their AI tools, lest they find themselves facing legal repercussions."
Host 1:"Allow me to shed some light for our esteemed listeners who may not be acquainted with the term 'negligent misrepresentation.' It's when one party knowingly or carelessly makes a false statement, and another party suffers as a result of relying on that misinformation. Quite the legal quagmire, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 2:"Quite so. The tribunal's ruling highlighted Air Canada's negligence in failing to ensure the accuracy of its chatbot. A rather glaring oversight, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 1:"Ah, the crux of the matter is this: for any company employing AI, it's imperative to ensure that your bots are dispensing nothing but the unvarnished truth. Otherwise, you may find yourself entangled in a legal imbroglio!"
Host 2:And as a discerning customer, one mustn't take everything a chatbot says at face value without verifying it independently!
Host 1:"Quite the astute observation. This legal ruling serves as a resounding wake-up call for companies utilizing AI in their customer service endeavors, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 2:"Indeed, it's a watershed case that could establish a significant precedent. It serves as a stark reminder that companies must ensure the reliability and accuracy of their AI tools, lest they find themselves facing legal repercussions."
Host 1:"Concluding today's tech news, do stay tuned for further captivating updates. And do keep in mind, don't allow the bots to pull the wool over your eyes!"
Host 1:"Have you heard about the recent Reddit deal with a major AI company? You're always so well-informed about the latest in tech news."
Host 2:"Absolutely! Reddit has been making some rather intriguing maneuvers. They've recently struck a licensing agreement with a prominent AI company, although the specifics are still shrouded in mystery. The essence of the deal lies in training AI models using Reddit's user-generated content. It's akin to imparting the art of conversation to a robot, employing Reddit's unique linguistic flair!"
Host 1:"Absolutely riveting! And might I inquire, what might be the valuation of this intriguing deal?"
Host 2:"Indeed, the grapevine suggests a figure in the vicinity of $60 million annually. However, it's not yet etched in stone. There's quite a buzz surrounding Reddit's potential IPO, rumored to take place as early as March. It's akin to a gripping suspense thriller, wouldn't you say?"
Host 1:"That's quite a substantial sum! I've also heard murmurs about Reddit contemplating the blocking of Google and Bing search crawlers unless they secure payment deals with AI companies for their data. Quite the bold move, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:"Indeed! This arrangement with the enigmatic AI company could establish a precedent for future agreements. It's as though Reddit is single-handedly dictating the terms of engagement!"
Host 1:"It's akin to a high-stakes game of chess, wouldn't you agree? And speaking of AI, didn't OpenAI propose to license news articles from some media firms for a significantly smaller sum?"
Host 2:Absolutely spot on! The proposals varied from a mere $1 million to $5 million annually. And it's not just OpenAI; even Apple is currently in negotiations with major news publishers to obtain licenses for their historical archives, all in aid of training its generative AI systems. These agreements could potentially amount to $50 million or more. It's akin to a fierce bidding war unfolding before our very eyes!
Host 1:"It's a remarkable era indeed! AI companies are more than willing to invest substantial sums for valuable data. It's akin to a modern-day gold rush, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:"Absolutely spot on! It's a captivating era we find ourselves in, wouldn't you agree? And for our esteemed listeners, picture this - your social media musings could very well be shaping the intellect of the next generation of AI! Quite the intriguing prospect, wouldn't you say?"
Host 1:"Shall we divert our attention from the captivating realm of AI advancements for a moment? Let's delve into the latest news from Xpeng, the esteemed Chinese EV manufacturer. It appears they are set to inject a staggering 3.5 billion yuan into AI research and development. Quite the intriguing move, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:"Indeed! Xpeng is poised to inject a substantial $486 million into AI research and development. The objective? To supercharge 'intelligent driving,' as hinted by their CEO, He Xiaopeng, in a memo to employees."
Host 1:"Quite the substantial sum, isn't it? And what exactly does this 'intelligent driving' entail, one wonders?"
Host 2:"Indeed, it's all about turbocharging Xpeng's Xpilot driver-assistance system. This ingenious system serves as the mastermind behind the semi-autonomous functionalities in their vehicles, such as self-parking and adaptive cruise control. Therefore, with this substantial investment, we can anticipate some remarkable enhancements on the horizon."
Host 1:"Xpeng seems to be revving up the engines, doesn't it? But wait, there's more, isn't there? I heard something about a massive hiring spree. Quite the intriguing development, wouldn't you say?"
Host 2:"Absolutely splendid! Xpeng has grand plans to welcome an additional 4,000 employees this year, marking a remarkable 25% increase from its 16,000-strong workforce in late 2022. Quite the ambitious expansion, wouldn't you agree?"
Host 1:"They're certainly making some bold moves! But it seems there may be a few storm clouds on the horizon, doesn't it? I heard the CEO made quite a dramatic statement about a potential 'bloodbath'?"
Host 2:Indeed, he did. Xiaopeng cautioned that 2024 might ignite a "fierce competition that could culminate in a 'bloodbath'... among Chinese automakers." It's quite the dramatic proclamation, yet it underscores the ruthless nature of the EV market.
Host 1:"It's bound to be quite the rollercoaster watching how it all plays out. Cheers for the brief interlude!"
Host 1:"Ah, you know how we adore discussing substantial tech investments, don't we? Well, here's a real whopper for you. Microsoft is gearing up to invest a staggering $2.1 billion in Spain. Their aim? To bolster their AI and cloud infrastructure. What's your perspective on this remarkable move?"
Host 2:"Oh, I do relish a captivating tale of tech investments. And this one is truly a spectacle. Microsoft isn't merely splashing the cash in Spain; they're making a profound commitment. As per their Vice Chair and President, Brad Smith, this endeavor transcends the mere construction of data centers. It stands as a testament to Microsoft's unwavering 37-year dedication to Spain, its security, and the digital metamorphosis of its government, businesses, and populace."
Host 1:"Quite the substantial commitment, isn't it? And it's not confined to Spain, is it? I hear they're also making significant investments in Germany, are they not?"
Host 2:Absolutely. They're set to invest €3 billion, or roughly $3.5 billion, into expanding their AI and cloud computing data centers in Germany over the same period. Quite the ambitious move, wouldn't you say?
Host 1:"That's quite a hefty sum in euros, isn't it? And if I'm not mistaken, they've also made a substantial investment in the U.K. recently, haven't they?"
Host 2:"In November, Microsoft made a colossal $3.2 billion investment in the U.K., marking their largest commitment to date in the country. This substantial sum is intended to bolster the growth of AI and expand data center capabilities. The British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, went so far as to hail this investment as a pivotal 'turning point' for the U.K.'s AI infrastructure and development."
Host 1:"Seems like Microsoft is quite the big spender these days. But considering the potential of AI and cloud computing, one might argue it's a rather shrewd move. What say you, dear listeners? Is Microsoft making astute decisions, or are they simply splashing the cash? Do share your thoughts in the comments section!"

OpenAI valued at $80B after deal / Reddit inks AI training deal / Xpeng to invest $486M in AI R&D [EN]
Broadcast by